TimeZone
  • Public Forum
  • Watch Talk
    • Public Forum
    • Only Watch 2013
    • Basel/SIHH 2013
    • Dive Watch Forum
    • Independent Horology
    • Ladies Watch Forum
    • Vintage Watch Forum
    • Watch Review Forum
    • Watchmaking & Repair
    • French Language Forum
    • Japanese Language Forum
  • Brand Forums A-H
    • A. Lange & Söhne
    • Audemars Piguet
    • Ball Watch
    • Bell & Ross
    • Blancpain
    • Breguet
    • Breitling
    • Cartier
    • FP Journe
    • German Brands
    • Girard-Perregaux
    • Glashütte Original
    • Heuer / TAG Heuer
    • Hublot
  • Brand Forums I-Z
    • IWC
    • Jaeger-LeCoultre
    • Montblanc
    • Officine Panerai
    • Omega
    • Patek Philippe
    • Richard Mille
    • Rolex – Modern
    • Rolex – Vintage
    • Seiko
    • Sinn
    • Tudor
    • Ulysse Nardin
    • Vacheron Constantin
    • Zenith
  • Community
    • Sales Corner
    • TZ Showcase
    • Watch Repair
    • Automotive Forum
    • Job Listings
    • GTG Reports
    • Lifestyle & Entertainment
    • Time Exposure
    • TZ Classics
    • Visit our Sponsors
  • News&Features
    • Industry News
    • Interviews
    • TZ Blogs
    • TZ Features
  • Resources
    • Guidelines and User Agreement
    • Lost Password
    • Register
    • Search TimeZone
    • Basel/SIHH
      • Basel/SIHH 2013
      • Basel/SIHH 2012
      • Basel/SIHH 2011
      • Basel/SIHH 2010
      • Basel/SIHH 2009
      • Basel/SIHH 2008
      • Basel/SIHH 2007
      • Basel/SIHH 2006
      • Basel/SIHH 2005
      • Basel/SIHH 2004
    • Only Watch
      • Only Watch 2013
    • Horologium
    • Inserting Images
    • TZ Archives
      • Adventures of Watchbore
      • Timelines
      • Carols’ Journal
      • Time Machine
      • It’s About Time
      • Time Warped
      • From The Workbench
      • Community Articles
      • TZ Tour 2006
      • TZ Tour 2005
      • Chopard CLOSED
      • Chronoswiss CLOSED
    • TZ Tool Shop
    • TZ Watch School
    • Vintage Watch Ads
    • Watch of the Year
      • 2012 Watch of the Year
      • 2011 Watch of the Year
      • 2010 Watch of the Year
      • 2009 Watch of the Year
      • 2008 Watch of the Year
      • 2007 Watch of the Year
      • 2006 Watch of the Year
      • 2005 Watch of the Year
    • Watch Repair
    • Wristwatch FAQ
    • Site Map
Goto Forum:
  

E-mail to friend 

Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply

jitsbits


Messages: 6648
Location: The Little Red Dot
Registered: November 2007
2012 SOTC Tally Thu, 10 January 2013 20:37 Go to previous message

Sorry to keep all of you waiting, here is my analysis of the 2012 SOTC. This is the third year I've tallied the SOTC's.
I've taken last year's tally post as the template and updated the figures.

COLLECTIONS
The tally for this year is 1,687 watches, compared to 1,725 last year. If you went back to last year's post, you'd notice the total was 1,596 when I did the analysis, but the eventual total was 1,725 watches.
There were 148 posts this year, exactly the same as last year. That's an average of 11.4 watches per post this year, vs 11.7 last year
Of the 148 posts, 70 were first time posters, 35 members posted each of the last three years. This factoid will turn out to be significant, as I explain at the end of this post.
Collection size ranged from 2 to 132 watches (Paul Delury's collection).

ERA
This year there were 1,328 modern and 359 vintage watches, making the split nearly 80/20, same as previous year

Photobucket

COMPLICATIONS
Besides time-only watches, chronographs are the most common complication.
The breakdown is very similar for all years. If I filtered out the vintage watches, the other complications will weigh in higher (see below analysis of modern watches)

Photobucket

CASE MATERIAL
Steel is most common case material. Margin for error may be as high as 20% - eg: PVD or DLC-coated cases assumed to be steel based. Steel-gold cases are usually classified as steel. Some exotic cases that were not identified as such may have been lumped under steel too.
There seems to be an upturn in RG watches, but I believe that to be my own inconsistencies in recording. I've also been more vigilant in recording vintage watches as Silver rather than Steel this year.
After preparing the tables, I noticed I left in a potato from one of the SOTC's post. Oh well.

Photobucket


BRANDS

Overall 201 brands were represented this year, compared to 207 last year
Cumulatively over the three years, 335 brands were represented. That's a huge number of watch brands!
Below lists the top ranked brands that tallied 10 or more this year, and the corresponding total previous two years


Photobucket

Notable decreases include Blancpain, Panerai, Lange. Notable increases include Sinn and Vacheron+Constantin.
Hamilton made a strong comeback this year, largely due to Paul Delury's massive vintage collection
Missing brands this year include Bucherer, Genta, Pierre Kunz, Alain Silberstein, Bulgari & Concord (only ever been 1 Bulgari and 1 Concord in 3 SOTC's)
I'll be posting a separate full table somewhere at the end of this post, if I can get it to show up legibly


VINTAGE ONLY
There were 359 vintage watches out of the 1,687 total.
Of 140 posts, 63 included at least one vintage watch - representing 45% of WIS'es.
Of these 63 vintage watch posts, 10 of them accounted for 63% of the vintage watches, a similar pattern from previous tallies.
The brand representation can be widely skewed depending on who posted their collection in each year
Again, Rolex and Omega may be larger - I may have misclassified some as modern


Photobucket

Vast majority of vintage watches were time-only

Photobucket


MODERN ONLY

The profile of complications for all years are quite similar - slightly more than half the watches are time only; chronographs are the most popular complication


Photobucket


There were 158 brands of modern watches represented
The top 32 brands below accounted for 1036 watches - the 20/80 rule almost precisely
Excluding vintage watches, Rolex is now the top-ranked brand, swapping places with Omega
I'll repeat what I commented last year: at a stretch you could take the breakdown below as a proxy for market share, not in the regular world, but in the WIS world.
I reckon there are essentially 3 tiers: Omega and Rolex are tier one, say 10% share each; then a bunch in tier two, between 2-5% share each; then the rest forming a very fragmented watch world
What's more interesting (and intuitively, rather than from data collected), is that the tier one is represented by relatively few models - Subs, Explorers, Daytonas, Speedmasters, Seamasters, etc
As we go down the tiers, the models and brands start to fragment to myriad models
So the typical WIS collector has a couple iconic models from tier 1, possibly 2-3 watches from tier 2, and then 5-6 personal favourites from tier 3, which runs to over 150 brands

Photobucket

What I said at the top of the post was that the three years of data came from rather different sets of posters each year. And yet, the data unveil a consistent pattern and profile each year. I find that significant.
If anyone would like the database, please contact me by email or PM. Do note it is in excel, and you'll need to understand basic pivot table
Thanks again for all your participation. I'm not sure I can do this again next year!

Jit
PS: Here's the total count broken down by brand. Squint if you must... :)

Photobucket

[Report message to a moderator]

 Send a private message to this user  
 
 
 
  • 2012 SOTC Tally - jitsbits - Thu, 10 January 2013 20:37 (1351 clicks)
  • As usual brilliant work! - samkan - Tue, 15 January 2013 23:33 (20 clicks)
  • Awesome, jit. Thanks again for this. [nt] - Champthekid - Tue, 15 January 2013 19:11 (19 clicks)
  • Thanks Jits! That's a post to look forward to every year! - mlnewman - Sat, 12 January 2013 23:22 (42 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - Watchaholic86 - Sat, 12 January 2013 11:02 (69 clicks)
  • Amazing! Thanks [nt] - Chick - Sat, 12 January 2013 09:03 (52 clicks)
  • You sir, are a WIS Saint for doing this!!! - lpoirier - Fri, 11 January 2013 22:51 (65 clicks)
  • IT'S PEOPLE LIKE YOU ....... - sattech1980 - Fri, 11 January 2013 18:02 (90 clicks)
  • Thanks so much for your efforts...... - doc.kool - Fri, 11 January 2013 16:26 (92 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - parkd - Fri, 11 January 2013 15:52 (94 clicks)
  • Amazing work, Jit. - sandisk7 - Fri, 11 January 2013 14:55 (99 clicks)
  • Thanks Jits for this wonderful compilation! - Dgercp - Fri, 11 January 2013 14:15 (109 clicks)
  • just awesome - sander - Fri, 11 January 2013 13:51 (109 clicks)
  • Thanks for sharing - subdate - Fri, 11 January 2013 13:44 (113 clicks)
  • Great Work - kev5366 - Fri, 11 January 2013 13:20 (109 clicks)
  • Thanks for all your hard work! - christianj - Fri, 11 January 2013 13:14 (113 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - Tony Nwaka - Fri, 11 January 2013 12:48 (122 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - JRG_13 - Fri, 11 January 2013 12:46 (127 clicks)
  • Thanks for such handling a momentous task! [nt] - samn - Fri, 11 January 2013 11:44 (120 clicks)
  • Thumbs up! Thank you. [nt] - sammysy - Fri, 11 January 2013 11:37 (124 clicks)
  • Wow - Herculean effort. Thanks for the detailed accounting. [nt] - Jessica - Fri, 11 January 2013 09:57 (137 clicks)
  • This is great, thanks for compiling it. [nt] - felipe - Fri, 11 January 2013 09:51 (140 clicks)
  • Love this information.Simply amazing work. Thank You! [nt] - msterling7 - Fri, 11 January 2013 09:32 (141 clicks)
  • Thank you, Jit, once again. [nt] - Jonas(CT) - Fri, 11 January 2013 09:21 (139 clicks)
  • incredible work! - Ninja Theorist - Fri, 11 January 2013 08:46 (152 clicks)
  • Nicely done, Jit. [nt] - Fatpants - Fri, 11 January 2013 08:29 (159 clicks)
  • Jit, you are amazing. Thanks for doing this! [nt] - ABN JAG - Fri, 11 January 2013 08:14 (162 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - BigDaddyDrew - Fri, 11 January 2013 07:44 (163 clicks)
  • awesome work! thanks for posting - galarza2073 - Fri, 11 January 2013 06:36 (174 clicks)
  • I don't think the difference from last year is significant - jitsbits - Fri, 11 January 2013 07:46 (165 clicks)
  • Thank you, Jit. Wonderful post. [nt] - Bill B - Fri, 11 January 2013 06:22 (179 clicks)
  • SOTC Tally - joba - Fri, 11 January 2013 05:49 (198 clicks)
  • interesting stats - Barge - Fri, 11 January 2013 04:54 (206 clicks)
  • Hmmm...but what type of rock? :-) [nt] - Paul Delury - Fri, 11 January 2013 05:19 (198 clicks)
  • er, some Swiss alp rock ;) [nt] - Barge - Fri, 11 January 2013 09:46 (138 clicks)
  • No I forgot I had "Rock" as a category, so I probably listed it as something else. - jitsbits - Fri, 11 January 2013 05:02 (202 clicks)
  • Excellent! Thanks very much for putting this together...> - Paul Delury - Fri, 11 January 2013 04:52 (203 clicks)
  • Thanks for advice on vintage case metals. - jitsbits - Fri, 11 January 2013 07:43 (164 clicks)
  • Thank you for your time & effort !!!! WELL DONE! [nt] - Emiel - Fri, 11 January 2013 04:51 (201 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - Jari from Finland - Fri, 11 January 2013 03:55 (208 clicks)
  • Wow, Jit - JizJizJiz - Fri, 11 January 2013 03:55 (210 clicks)
  • a labor of love - donizetti - Fri, 11 January 2013 01:59 (227 clicks)
  • Thank you very much, as always. Jit, you're so great to do this! [nt] - boa2 - Fri, 11 January 2013 01:56 (226 clicks)
  • THANKS for the major effort!! - bigtoys - Fri, 11 January 2013 01:50 (226 clicks)
  • Great work!! - Sven - Fri, 11 January 2013 01:14 (229 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - Watch Professor - Fri, 11 January 2013 00:41 (245 clicks)
  • Thank you! - toronto - Fri, 11 January 2013 00:33 (245 clicks)
  • Great work! [nt] - smog - Fri, 11 January 2013 00:28 (251 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - mayor10 - Fri, 11 January 2013 00:19 (277 clicks)
  • I'm sure it's our loss that you haven't been able to post your collection! - jitsbits - Fri, 11 January 2013 04:06 (207 clicks)
  • Very nice analysis - Braindrain - Thu, 10 January 2013 23:57 (259 clicks)
  • Great! Thanks ... - foodle - Thu, 10 January 2013 23:36 (268 clicks)
  • You should take comfort from that... - jitsbits - Fri, 11 January 2013 00:52 (236 clicks)
  • Wow!!! - tdoe2 - Thu, 10 January 2013 23:34 (262 clicks)
  • That's a lot of work. Thank you. [nt] - SRG - Thu, 10 January 2013 23:20 (267 clicks)
  • Fascinating data. Lots of fun to review. Thank you so much!!! [nt] - Michael Schott - Thu, 10 January 2013 23:19 (268 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - elau - Thu, 10 January 2013 23:04 (284 clicks)
  • Awesome work; thank you. - Damon - Thu, 10 January 2013 23:03 (276 clicks)
  • You should let Tommy Bahama know what an ambassador you for them. - jitsbits - Fri, 11 January 2013 00:54 (238 clicks)
  • Incredible work Jit. Thanks! - KeyT - Thu, 10 January 2013 22:50 (282 clicks)
  • Re: 2012 SOTC Tally - red1108nyc - Thu, 10 January 2013 22:49 (283 clicks)
  • outstanding post!. thank you for the time and effort [nt] - Levy03 - Thu, 10 January 2013 22:32 (291 clicks)
  • Thank you for the postq - DRWWE - Thu, 10 January 2013 22:14 (299 clicks)
  • fantastic Jits! - edmd - Thu, 10 January 2013 22:09 (298 clicks)
  • Fantastic and fascinating! Thank you for putting this together [nt] - HondaF1 - Thu, 10 January 2013 22:01 (305 clicks)
  • Great work. Thank you... - liu_watch - Thu, 10 January 2013 21:54 (307 clicks)
  • Life is Complicated. This one is simple :) - jitsbits - Thu, 10 January 2013 22:32 (296 clicks)
  • Big kudos [nt] - 1point4 - Thu, 10 January 2013 21:39 (316 clicks)
  • I'm hoping to pick up another root vegetable this year... maybe a yam. [nt] - PAHarris - Thu, 10 January 2013 21:38 (322 clicks)
  • Re: I'm hoping to pick up another root vegetable this year... maybe a yam. - r0gue - Fri, 11 January 2013 20:26 (75 clicks)
  • Thanks for the tally Jit! - Downtown Mike - Thu, 10 January 2013 21:34 (317 clicks)
  • Please tell me you had a site scraper managing this... - ingmar - Thu, 10 January 2013 21:28 (325 clicks)
  • Thank you for including the potato :-) [nt] - phreude - Thu, 10 January 2013 20:50 (328 clicks)

  • Goto Forum:
      
    Previous Topic: Repair Cost to New Cost
    Next Topic: Should one use a vintage watch

    © 2013 Bourne in Time Inc. | TimeZone Guidelines and Policies