TimeZone
  • Public Forum
  • Watch Talk
    • Public Forum
    • 2012 Watch of the Year
    • Basel/SIHH 2013
    • Dive Watch Forum
    • Independent Horology
    • Ladies Watch Forum
    • Vintage Watch Forum
    • Watch Review Forum
    • Watchmaking & Repair
    • French Language Forum
    • Japanese Language Forum
  • Brand Forums A-H
    • A. Lange & Söhne
    • Audemars Piguet
    • Ball Watch
    • Bell & Ross
    • Blancpain
    • Breguet
    • Breitling
    • Cartier
    • FP Journe
    • German Brands
    • Girard-Perregaux
    • Glashütte Original
    • Heuer / TAG Heuer
    • Hublot
  • Brand Forums I-Z
    • IWC
    • Jaeger-LeCoultre
    • Montblanc
    • Officine Panerai
    • Omega
    • Patek Philippe
    • Richard Mille
    • Rolex – Modern
    • Rolex – Vintage
    • Seiko
    • Sinn
    • Tudor
    • Ulysse Nardin
    • Vacheron Constantin
    • Zenith
  • Community
    • Sales Corner
    • TZ Showcase
    • Watch Repair
    • Automotive Forum
    • Job Listings
    • GTG Reports
    • Lifestyle & Entertainment
    • Time Exposure
    • TZ Classics
    • Visit our Sponsors
  • News&Features
    • Industry News
    • Interviews
    • TZ Blogs
    • TZ Features
  • Resources
    • Guidelines and User Agreement
    • Lost Password
    • Register
    • Search TimeZone
    • Basel/SIHH
      • Basel/SIHH 2013
      • Basel/SIHH 2012
      • Basel/SIHH 2011
      • Basel/SIHH 2010
      • Basel/SIHH 2009
      • Basel/SIHH 2008
      • Basel/SIHH 2007
      • Basel/SIHH 2006
      • Basel/SIHH 2005
      • Basel/SIHH 2004
    • Horologium
    • Inserting Images
    • TZ Archives
      • Adventures of Watchbore
      • Timelines
      • Carols’ Journal
      • Time Machine
      • It’s About Time
      • Time Warped
      • From The Workbench
      • Community Articles
      • TZ Tour 2006
      • TZ Tour 2005
      • Chopard CLOSED
      • Chronoswiss CLOSED
    • TZ Tool Shop
    • TZ Watch School
    • Vintage Watch Ads
    • Watch of the Year
      • 2012 Watch of the Year
      • 2011 Watch of the Year
      • 2010 Watch of the Year
      • 2009 Watch of the Year
      • 2008 Watch of the Year
      • 2007 Watch of the Year
      • 2006 Watch of the Year
      • 2005 Watch of the Year
    • Watch Repair
    • Wristwatch FAQ
    • Site Map
Goto Forum:
  

E-mail to friend 

Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply

Bob L.


Messages: 2187
Location: New York
Registered: November 2003
Sharing DNA, But Not Identical Twins Fri, 04 January 2013 08:54 Go to previous message

Audemars' great 2120 movement is used in several of the manufacture's watches. As I understand it, the movement was developed in the 1960s in conjunction with three other great houses: Vacheron Constantin, Patek Philippe, and Jaeger LeCoultre. Today, Vacheron uses its version -- the 1120 -- in several great watches, from the simple (like the special platinum version of the Patimony Contemporaine) to the complex (like the Patrimony Contemporaine Perpetual Calendar).

Like VC, I believe that AP uses the 2120 in both simple and complex watches. It's great for complex watches because, as a beautiful thin caliber, it can be coupled with complications without creating movements that are overly thick. And it is great for "simple" watches because it allows for thin cases, and uncluttered two-hand only dials.

Two of my favorite watches sporting the 2120 are on the simple end of the spectrum, and relatively new in the AP lineup. First is the well-known and much appreciated 40th anniverary edition of the Royal Oak "Jumbo":

Hosting provided by FotoTime

Second, in recent years, AP has really stepped up a notch in its Jules Audemars collection, and the resulting Extra Thin is a beautiful watch:

Hosting provided by FotoTime

And now, to prove that the two very different watches share a common core, here are shots from the back:

Hosting provided by FotoTime

Hosting provided by FotoTime

Thanks for sharing in this ramble.

Bob

[Report message to a moderator]

 Send a private message to this user  
 
 
 
  • Sharing DNA, But Not Identical Twins - Bob L. - Fri, 04 January 2013 08:54 (1236 clicks)
  • Re: Sharing DNA, But Not Identical Twins - blackjoe - Mon, 07 January 2013 03:41 (94 clicks)
  • Re: Sharing DNA, But Not Identical Twins - roppap - Sun, 06 January 2013 07:39 (95 clicks)
  • Great duo! Thanks! [nt] - Vipes - Sat, 05 January 2013 19:16 (103 clicks)
  • Re: Sharing DNA, But Not Identical Twins - galarza2073 - Sat, 05 January 2013 07:41 (119 clicks)
  • Nice write up Bob [nt] - kev5366 - Sat, 05 January 2013 00:32 (124 clicks)
  • Outstanding, Bob! - boa2 - Fri, 04 January 2013 20:10 (146 clicks)
  • Re: Sharing DNA, But Not Identical Twins - kilyung - Fri, 04 January 2013 18:09 (145 clicks)
  • Re: Sharing DNA, But Not Identical Twins - Colin W - Fri, 04 January 2013 16:26 (153 clicks)
  • Great timepieces.. - leostar - Fri, 04 January 2013 11:05 (166 clicks)

  • Goto Forum:
      
    Previous Topic: What are you doing, and wearing, for the weekend?
    Next Topic: Made my mind up. Thanks!!!

    © 2013 Bourne in Time Inc. | TimeZone Guidelines and Policies